Crimes committed by police officers in charge of protecting the people

Crime has infiltrated its way to every part of our society today in small towns as well as large cities. We rely upon our society’s heroes, cops, to ensure the streets are safe. But what happens when law enforcement officers are the ones committing crimes? Here are 4 such cases that make us wonder who we should be more afraid of, the criminals or the cops:

Officer Jennifer Green

Officer Jennifer Green was a 5 year veteran with the D.C. police who was charged for theft after the internal affairs pulled a sting operation on her. Internal affairs used an informant with an assault case for the operation. Green met the informant to discuss an apartment that contained a large amount of drugs and money. Green told her informant that she could use the money. The informant entered the apartment and handed over $1050 to her and she gladly accepted the money.

Officers Jonathan Cantrell and Gregory Moore

Shannon Kanda was severely beaten up twice on a single night. The first attack left her with mild bruises. When she called in the cops, Officers Jonathan Cantrell and Gregory Moore banged her head against a metal staircase, leaving her with a broken skull that required reconstructive surgery. When Kanda filed a complaint, the officers instead sued her for attacking two police officers. According to them, they feared their safety and were threatened by the traumatized, drunk woman who allegedly tried to attack the two highly trained, armed police officers.

Sheriff Patrick Sullivan

Patrick Sullivan was one of the top sheriffs in the country. When he retired after 30 years of service in 2002, the county named the local jail after him. Unfortunately, retirement didn’t suit Sullivan. In 2012, he was videotaped during a sting operation that showed the former sheriff trying to trade meth in exchange of sex with an informant. Sullivan was sent to the Patrick Sullivan Correctional Facility. The county has renamed the jail since then.

Detectives Lou Eppolito and Stephen Caracappa

Lou Eppolito and Stephen Caracappa were detectives with the NYPD Mafia Task Force who loved to fight crime. They were Mafia Task Force agents by day and mafia hit men by night. The pair carried out more than 8 hits for Anthony Casso, a known gangster. They used their NYPD cars to pull over their victims for a routine traffic stop and carried out their hits. In fact, Eppolito also wrote a book “Mafia Cop: The story of an honest cop whose family was the mob” that eventually set the wheels in motion and led to his arrest.

Image Credits: Flynt/BigStock.com

By Priyanka Trivedi|February 12th, 2014|Current Events, Lists, Role models|12 Comments

Darlene Strand

I worked in Security for five years before retiring. Victims and the people that commit crimes can sometime be misunderstood by the public in general. However, some issues with bad cops or overrated cops in the line of duty can be explosive and uncontrolled by the officer on scene at the site where crime is or has taken place. I think to be fair to both sides , investigation, follow up, and other possible law enforcement procedures may be in order to resolve critical decisions on the mismanagement of our big brothers in Law Enforcement!
https://www.soundtrap.com/33nanoseconds 33nanoseconds

Is this site still active? All the articles are from 5 years ago.
SUMIT

Ok
Anil Pradhan

Police misconduct raises major concerns and threatens public confidence in the justice system. The use of excessive force, corruption, misconduct, and other offenses are examples of such crimes. To overcome these problems and regain the public’s trust, law enforcement organizations must hold officers responsible for their acts and uphold openness. Please feel free to inquire if you have specific questions or require information on a specific instance or topic connected to this.
Anil Pradhan

Police misconduct raises major concerns and threatens public confidence in the justice system. The use of excessive force, corruption, misconduct, and other offenses are examples of such crimes. To overcome these problems and regain the public’s trust, law enforcement organizations must hold officers responsible for their acts and uphold openness. Please feel free to inquire if you have specific questions or require information on a specific instance or topic connected to this.
Nirob

Crimes committed by law enforcement officers who are entrusted with safeguarding the public can be characterized as instances of police misconduct or police malfeasance. These acts involve the violation of laws and ethical standards by individuals holding positions of authority within the law enforcement community, resulting in breaches of public trust and potential legal consequences.
Laxman Kumar

Crimes committed by police officers are a serious concern as they undermine public trust in law enforcement. Some examples of crimes committed by police officers may include excessive use of force, corruption, theft, drug-related offenses, and even more severe cases such as murder. It’s essential for such incidents to be thoroughly investigated and for officers found guilty to be held accountable through the legal system to maintain public confidence in policing. Police departments often have internal affairs units to investigate allegations of misconduct within their ranks. Additionally, civilian oversight boards or independent agencies may also play a role in ensuring accountability.
Laxman Kumar

police officers, who are entrusted with protecting the public, can erode trust in law enforcement and have serious consequences. Such crimes may include excessive use of force, misconduct, corruption, and even cases of brutality or abuse of power. It’s essential for police departments to address these issues through internal investigations, transparency, and accountability measures to maintain public trust and uphold the rule of law.
Khankhalfan

TertiaryCrime Prevention & Criminal JusticeModule 4: Use of Force and FirearmsKey Issues3. General Principles of Use of Force in Law Enforcement
E4J University Module Series: Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice
Module 4: Use of Force and Firearms
Introduction and learning outcomes
Key issues
Topic 1. The context for use of force by law enforcement officials
Topic 2. The legal framework
Topic 3. The general principles of use of force in law enforcement
Topic 4. The use of firearms
Topic 5. The use of “less-lethal” weapons
Topic 6. The protection of especially vulnerable groups
Topic 7. The use of force during assemblies
Summary
References
Exercises
Case studies
Possible class structure
Core reading
Advanced reading
Student assessment
Additional teaching tools
Guidelines to develop a stand-alone course

First published in March 2019

This module is a resource for lecturers

Topic three – The general principles of use of force in law enforcement

The principles of necessity, proportionality and precaution, introduced in Key Terms, are expanded upon below.

The principle of necessity
The principle of necessity has three interrelated elements: the duty to use non-violent means wherever possible; the duty to use force only for a legitimate law enforcement purpose; and the duty to use only the minimum necessary force that is reasonable in the prevailing circumstances.

Wherever possible, law enforcement officials should use non-violent means to achieve a legitimate law enforcement objective before resorting to physical force. This default position is explicitly affirmed in Principle 4 of the 1990 Basic Principles: “Law enforcement officials, in carrying out their duty, shall, as far as possible, apply non-violent means before resorting to the use of force and firearms. They may use force and firearms only if other means remain ineffective or without any promise of achieving the intended result.”
Khankhalfan

TertiaryCrime Prevention & Criminal JusticeModule 4: Use of Force and FirearmsKey Issues3. General Principles of Use of Force in Law Enforcement
E4J University Module Series: Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice
Module 4: Use of Force and Firearms
Introduction and learning outcomes
Key issues
Topic 1. The context for use of force by law enforcement officials
Topic 2. The legal framework
Topic 3. The general principles of use of force in law enforcement
Topic 4. The use of firearms
Topic 5. The use of “less-lethal” weapons
Topic 6. The protection of especially vulnerable groups
Topic 7. The use of force during assemblies
Summary
References
Exercises
Case studies
Possible class structure
Core reading
Advanced reading
Student assessment
Additional teaching tools
Guidelines to develop a stand-alone course

First published in March 2019

This module is a resource for lecturers

Topic three – The general principles of use of force in law enforcement

The principles of necessity, proportionality and precaution, introduced in Key Terms, are expanded upon below.

The principle of necessity
The principle of necessity has three interrelated elements: the duty to use non-violent means wherever possible; the duty to use force only for a legitimate law enforcement purpose; and the duty to use only the minimum necessary force that is reasonable in the prevailing circumstances.

Wherever possible, law enforcement officials should use non-violent means to achieve a legitimate
Keurgautam

ITS GOOD
Keurgautam

“Unveiling Shadows: When Those Enforcing the Law Become the Lawbreakers”

Crime has become an unwelcome companion in both small towns and sprawling metropolises, weaving its insidious tendrils into the very fabric of our society. In this landscape of uncertainty, we look to our law enforcement officers as the guardians of order, tasked with maintaining the safety and security of our streets. However, a disconcerting reality has emerged—instances where those sworn to uphold the law become perpetrators themselves, leaving us questioning whom to trust and fear.

The Betrayal in Blue:
In a small town that once epitomized close-knit community values, the revelation of a police officer engaging in corruption and drug trafficking shattered the illusion of safety. The very person entrusted with protecting the town became entangled in criminal activities, leaving residents grappling with the harsh reality that even their own local heroes may succumb to the allure of illicit gains.

The City’s Dark Secret:
In the heart of a bustling metropolis, a high-ranking law enforcement official was exposed for orchestrating a sophisticated network of bribery and extortion. This case not only highlighted the systemic issues within the department but also raised questions about the extent to which corruption had permeated the ranks. The betrayal felt by the citizens ran deep, as those who were supposed to be champions of justice turned out to be architects of deception.

Abuse of Power in the Suburbs:
A suburban community was rocked by the revelation of a police officer abusing their authority for personal vendettas. Misusing resources, conducting unwarranted searches, and engaging in intimidation tactics, this officer exemplified the dangers that arise when power goes unchecked. The incident served as a stark reminder that the badge does not always guarantee virtuous conduct, and vigilance is crucial to prevent the erosion of trust in law enforcement.

The Unseen Predators:
In a case that sent shockwaves through society, a group of officers was exposed for engaging in heinous criminal activities, including assault, kidnapping, and even murder. These officers, who were meant to protect and serve, instead became perpetrators of the very crimes they were supposed to prevent. This case underscored the importance of rigorous oversight and accountability measures within law enforcement agencies.

As these cases unfold, the overarching question arises: who should we fear when those entrusted with upholding the law betray that trust? The answer is not a straightforward one. Rather, it necessitates a collective call for transparency, accountability, and reform within our law enforcement institutions. In the face of these disheartening revelations, it becomes imperative for society to remain vigilant, demanding justice and ethical conduct from those who wield the power to shape our communities. Only through unwavering scrutiny and a commitment to upholding the principles of justice can we hope to rebuild the shattered trust and ensure that our society’s heroes truly stand as guardians of righteousness.